Generative AI can identify information and present it in a very convincing way, but remember, it doesn’t know if its sources are correct or not. This means output might be biased, misleading or wrong. Information could also be out-of-date (ChatGPT data cuts off at 2021) and accuracy will vary from subject to subject, depending on how much has been written already.
As generative AI does not critically evaluate the content it produces or its information sources, it’s important to be wary of any secondary sources cited. They may be fictitious, unreliable or completely unrelated to the subject area. You should use the same caution with a generative AI that you would with non-academic sources, such as Wikipedia, and always verify information and sources independently.
If you are unsure if it’s appropriate to use generative AI for your academic work, please read the assessment brief carefully, and discuss it with your tutor if you still have questions. Unless you are advised it is acceptable, don’t use it.
You must receive consent before entering work created by others into the AI tool as a prompt.
It’s never acceptable to present something produced by a generative AI tool as your own work (see ‘What’s the penalty for unauthorised use of AI?’).